Q What are your thoughts on split custody of two siblings?
Eight months ago, the son asked to move in with the father. Now he's asking to move back to his mom's house. He's 11.
His reasons for wanting to return are to see his mom and his
6-year-old sister more; to have friends, because he has made no new
ones in his current school or neighborhood; and he doesn't like the
fact that no one is there when he gets home from school.
His dad doesn't want him to go back, but I think the son is very
lonely. He mentioned in passing that he moved in with his father
because he didn't want his dad to be lonely. The divorce was four years
ago. His mom has remarried, and his dad just recently started dating.
Is it a good idea to let a child select where he wants to live? Is
it hurtful to separate siblings? Should the dad get to decide where the
child lives? Would a family counselor be a good idea to sort through
the issues?
A Who decides where a minor child
lives after a divorce? Sometimes a judge decides; sometimes the
decision is made by mediation. Sometimes the parents fight over where
the child will live. Sometimes the child has input, sometimes not.
What's best for the child? Two parents who love the child,
understand the child's needs, realize the impact that divorce has on a
child, and communicate well so that they can work together continuously
on what's best for the children as they grow and develop.
I'm guessing that the person who wrote today's letter is a
grandparent. I infer that the parents are not paying much attention to
their child and don't communicate well. I also infer that the boy asked
to leave about the time mom got married. Mom now had a husband and two
kids, while dad had no one. I find it interesting and disquieting that
some children of divorce end up taking care of their parents instead of
the other way around.
To answer your questions, splitting two siblings is not a good
idea. There are enough other changes going on in the children's lives
at the time of a divorce. As for an 11-year-old deciding where he wants
to live, if a custody fight came before the court, most judges would
ask the child — or have the child and both homes evaluated — before
making a final decision.
Your letter points out a major pitfall in letting the child
decide. It was noble of the boy to want to take care of his father, but
he's too young to take on such a task. Depending on what the custody
arrangements are, dad doesn't have the sole right to decide.
Family counseling would be a great idea if all parties, including
the mother's new husband, are willing, and are all in a mode of "I want
what's best for the kids." Individual counseling for the boy could help
him realize that he's the kid and he deserves friends and stability in
his life, even if dad is lonely.
Finally, it's fortunate that most children are resilient, because
so many parents today have it backward. They put themselves first —
before the kids. Some children of divorce never quite get over it. I
recently heard a man in his 60s mention it was the 50th anniversary of
his parents' divorce. He remembered the exact day.
I realize that not every couple can or wants to follow these
rules, but here are Dr. Heins' rules for protecting children from the
effects of divorce:
● Don't get married unless you expect to spend the rest of your life married to this person.
● Don't have children unless they will be able to spend their entire childhood in the two-parent family you created.
● Don't get divorced unless you're comfortable with the idea that
your kids might spend their entire lives remembering a divorce
anniversary and its impact.
From the Arizona Daily Star.
From the Arizona Daily Star.
Recent Comments