Other than Christmas, Valentine's Day is the day when most engagements take place. Traditionally, with the marriage proposal comes an engagement ring. In an ideal world, newly engaged happy couples stay that way through to the wedding. However, in the event things don't quite go as planned, it might be practical to know what legal rights surround the engagement ring in the event of a breakup.
An engagement ring that accompanies a proposal is considered to be a gift given in the contemplation of marriage. The gift in the form of the engagement ring would not be given unless for the promise of a future marriage. There is a statute in the California Civil Code 1590 that addresses this type of gift.
According to the statute, the circumstances surrounding the breakup determine the proper owner of the engagement ring. The "giver" may recover the ring or the value of the ring if the "receiver" refuses to enter into marriage. The "giver" also has a right to recover the ring if the contemplated marriage is abandoned by mutual consent.
Although not explicitly stated in the statute, subsequent case law has determined that the "receiver" of the engagement ring is entitled to keep the ring if the "giver" refuses to enter the marriage without any fault of the "receiver." Therefore, if the "giver" is the one who backs out of the wedding, then the "giver" does not have the right to get the engagement ring back.
Even though the statute specifically applies to gifts given in contemplation marriage, general principles of fraud may still apply and affect any claim to recovery.
Thanks for your info. Could you please e-mail me a couple of citations of those "subsequent case law" rulings in favor of this reading?
Thanks much.
Posted by: David Bennett | June 04, 2006 at 03:35 PM
I believe the term for this is "conditional gift"
Posted by: Engagement Rings | January 12, 2007 at 08:38 AM
What if, after the engagement is broken off, the "giver" tells the "reciever" to keep said engagement ring as some other type of gift anyway? Would the "giver" still have a right to claim recovery of the ring?
Posted by: Kat | July 27, 2007 at 04:34 PM
What State law governs the return of an engagement ring -the State where the proposal was made or the state where the couple reside?
Posted by: Steve S | March 27, 2008 at 05:13 PM
What happens if the engagement ring is given, the wedding occurs, and the receiver/Wife abandons the marriage?
Posted by: Scott B | April 26, 2008 at 03:12 PM
Would the engagement ring be included into the terms of a pre-nup?
Posted by: Ess | June 11, 2008 at 05:25 PM
Wow, I think this is the first time I've actually seen legal rulings about engagement rings. Wish I knew this before my divorce went through.
Posted by: Brian Magnani | May 23, 2009 at 09:18 AM
Your statement "Without any fault of the receiver" sounds like a very broad term. What if the receiver accidentally got drunk and behaved badly and the giver broke off the engagement a few days later?
Posted by: Jane | May 26, 2009 at 12:13 PM
Thank you for bringing up this,its good that we have an resources about this informative about engagement ring.
by: rhianne
Posted by: tungsten wedding ring | June 08, 2009 at 02:09 AM
What if the "reciever" becomes an incorrigible, heinous person (other explitives omitted), yet doesn't officially call it off? The "giver" has had enough and backs out.
Posted by: Broken | July 30, 2009 at 09:21 AM
wow didn't know actual laws existed for the ownership of engagement rings
Posted by: wedding rings | January 12, 2010 at 07:51 PM
Your statement Without any fault of the receiver sounds like a very broad term. What if the receiver accidentally got drunk and behaved badly and the giver broke off the engagement a few days later?
+1
Posted by: index flash games | July 10, 2012 at 07:07 PM